Penn State University

Tools and Resources

Alphabetical List

Browse through the tools by the title of the resource.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

There are matrices to use when aligning specific General Education courses with core competencies.

This is a true and false quiz to test assumptions about student ratings.

Citations about mentoring, primarily academic mentoring. Includes references for mentoring faculty, mentoring graduate students, mentoring minority academic, mentoring for diversity & inclusion.

This page lists resources that can help faculty create inclusive classrooms. Resources are related to diversity and inclusivity.

This matching and discussion activity helps participants recognize how different audiences can interpret language and microaggressions and understand the implications of speech. Participants are asked to identify and interpret microaggressions and have an opportunity to modify questions or comments in ways that are less likely to reflect stereotypic assumptions and beliefs. Additional discussion questions expand the activity by prompting reflection. Created as a student activity by Professor Mary Kite, and her students LaCount "JJ" Togans, LaDeidre Robinson, and Kelly Lynn Meredith at Ball State University.

The Midterm/Midsemester Class Interview (or Small Group Instructional Diagnosis, SGID) is a process designed to help instructors learn what their students think about how the course is going. Students identify elements of the class that are helping them learn and offer suggestions to strengthen the course. We recommend using this procedure in the middle of the semester, after students have received at least one grade. The process involves three steps: 1) meeting with an instructional consultant to discuss the instructor's objectives for the process; 2) a class interview with small groups and a whole class discussion; and a post-interview summary and discussion of the results with the consultant.

The Midterm/Midsemester Class Interview (or Small Group Instructional Diagnosis, SGID) is a process designed to help instructors learn what their students think about how the course is going. Students identify elements of the class that are helping them learn and offer suggestions to strengthen the course. We recommend using this procedure in the middle of the semester, after students have received at least one grade. The process involves three steps: 1) meeting with an instructional consultant to discuss the instructor's objectives for the process; 2) a class interview with small groups and a whole class discussion; and a post-interview summary and discussion of the results with the consultant.

MSEEQ slides for faculty to share with their students in class. These include the QR code for the student application. Slide notes include examples of talking points. Instructors may download and edit the slides, which allows you to see the slide notes. We recommend downloading the slides, rather than showing them from a tab in your browser.
Also included is a slide of an anonymized screenshot of an instructor report so students can see how their responses are aggregated.

SEEQ & MSEEQ availability by calendar year; updated annually in January.
Page 1 includes full term Semester dates only: Spring, Maymester, Summer, and Fall.
Page 2 includes dates for shorter terms (S71, S72) Maymester, Summer (S1, S2), and Fall (F71, F72).
Page 3 includes an accessible list of dates for all semesters.
See also an accessible list at: https://www.schreyerinstitute.psu.edu/pdf/MSEEQ_&_SEEQ_DatesList_accessible.docx

Accessible list of SEEQ & MSEEQ dates by calendar year; updated annually in January. Semesters included: Spring (Sp, S71, S72) Maymester, Summer (S, S1, S2), and Fall (Fa, F71, F72).

This handout was provided at the workshop "Writing High Quality Multiple Choice Questions" (10/26/2018) by Hoi K. Suen

Distinguished Professor Emeritus

Educational Psychology

The Penn State University

Self-reflection as it relates to teaching is the practice of critically thinking about our experiences and their implications by drawing on multiple sources. These sources include peers, students, self, and literature.

Penn State University